← Selected work

Discovery · Market validation · Go-to-market

Rooms: From 2 Design Partners to 436 Customers

How do you launch a second product inside a company whose entire operating rhythm is built around the first?

Company
Apptegy
Period
2020–2022
Disciplines
Product Discovery, Validation, Growth
Chapters
8
2 → 436
Rooms customers in two years
0
Rebuilds after launch
00

The 60-second version

The problem
The risk was not build speed.
The scale
2 → 436 rooms customers in two years
My role
Senior Product Manager. Came up with Rooms during COVID and shipped it, from the original idea to a product districts paid for.
What changed
Rooms itself: a validated product definition grounded in design-partner evidence.
The result
436 customers within two years of launch, from two design partners.
01

The situation

COVID closed school buildings and left districts with no reliable way to keep families connected to individual classrooms. Apptegy had a successful flagship product and an operating rhythm built entirely around it. I conceived Rooms in that gap and shipped it, and the temptation was to build it the way the first product had been built, on conviction and speed, and let the market sort it out.

02

The actual problem

The request was

“Build the second product and get it to market fast.”

Discovery showed

The risk was not build speed. It was that the second product's buyer, budget cycle, and success criteria were different from the flagship's, and the existing go-to-market motion quietly assumed they were the same.

Discovery had to cover the commercial model as much as the product. If we shipped into the flagship's motion, adoption would stall for reasons no feature could fix.

03

What I learned

  • Ran structured discovery with design-partner districts before committing scope.
  • Validated willingness to pay and budget ownership separately from product interest.
  • Mapped the adoption path inside a district, who champions, who blocks, who renews.
04

How I framed it

Exhibit

Adoption Curve: Launch to Year Two

Q1
2
Q2
14
Q3
61
Q4
148
Y2 H1
290
Y2 H2
436

The flat opening is the whole strategy. Everything after it is compounding.

What you're looking atDeliberately slow for two quarters. We held the line on design partners until the value story was provable, then opened the funnel.
05

What we built

  • 01Rooms itself: a validated product definition grounded in design-partner evidence.
  • 02A go-to-market motion tuned to the actual buyer and budget cycle for Rooms, not the flagship's.
  • 03Adoption and expansion mechanics that let Rooms grow inside existing accounts.
She has strong convictions and ideas, and backs both up through methodical research and validation.
Kathleen Conley, Product Manager at ApptegyKathleen ConleyProduct Manager at ApptegyRead in full →
06

My role

Conceived
Came up with Rooms during COVID and shipped it, from the original idea to a product districts paid for.
Discovery
Led customer research and validation directly.
Product
Owned definition, scope, and sequencing.
Commercial
Partnered on pricing, packaging, and the adoption path.
07

The outcome

  • 436 customers within two years of launch, from two design partners.
  • No post-launch rebuild. The definition held as it scaled.
  • Rooms later evolved into Messaging Essentials and Group Connect.
  • A repeatable pattern for launching adjacent products in the portfolio.
08

What I'd do differently

Holding at two customers for two quarters was the least comfortable decision of the project and the one that made the rest work. I have since learned to name that phase explicitly up front so it reads as strategy rather than as slippage.

Contact

Let's get into it.

Ambiguous problem, AI adoption that stalled, an operating model that stopped scaling, a support function that should be a product. That is the conversation I want.